📝 SceneThe Court of Appeal in Putrajaya, bathed in neutral daylight, features five ornate wooden benches. A single, framed legal document rests on a polished table, hinting at the recent ruling. Overhead, subtle architectural details suggest a formal, yet understated, judicial setting. Low angle., court sketch illustration style, soft colored pencil and pastel on grey-toned paper, quick gestural strokes, warm skin tones against cool neutral background, courtroom composition, observational documentary feel, no text no letters no words
馬來西亞上訴法院裁定,Pahang州政府有權自行調整土地年租費率,無需National Land 理事會逐一批准具體金額。
上訴法院由3名法官組成的合議庭一致裁定,駁回成功集團(柏哈ya 希爾s Resort Bhd)及數名相關地主提出的5項上訴。這些上訴挑戰的是Pahang州政府調漲土地年租(quit rent)費率的決定。主審法官正義 達圖k Choo Kah 新加坡在判決中釐清了土地治理的關鍵權責劃分:National Land Code明確授權州政府決定土地年租費率,而National Land 理事會的角色則是制定國家土地政策,並批准各州啟動費率調整的時機。換言之,National Land 理事會只需批准州政府「何時」進行調整,至於調整後的「具體金額」則由州政府依National Land Code自行決定。《自由馬來西亞今日》(Free Malaysia Today)與《馬來郵報》(Malay Mail)均報導了此判決。